live-bootstrap/steps/linux-4.14.341-openela/patches/i915_sw_fence.patch
fosslinux a67db8fcbd Make patches relative to where tarballs are extracted
Ever since an old patch version, it has (for reasonable security
reasons) not supported patched with ../ in the filename.
Many of our patches have been relying on this behaviour being OK,
because we start off with an ancient patch version that didn't perform
such checks. As soon as we need this behaviour after we build a newer
patch though, we will have problems.

So, let's change the policy.
Patches are relative to where tarballs are extracted, rather than the
"working directory" - e.g. have patches for `coreutils-9.4/src/cp.c`
instead of `src/cp.c`.
Keeping this consistent has a few implications;
- patches are applied from the build/ directory in bash era now, with
  `-p0`
- when patches are manually applied in the bash era, use `-p` as
  required, usually `-p1`
- in kaem era where patches are always manually applied, `-p1` is used
2024-12-23 15:20:42 +11:00

17 lines
682 B
Diff

SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2024 Gábor Stefanik <netrolller.3d@gmail.com>
SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
Neuter the __i915_sw_fence_call define, which our gcc can't understand
--- linux-4.14.336/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.h.bak 2024-02-15 12:21:07.758127759 +0100
+++ linux-4.14.336/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sw_fence.h 2024-02-15 12:22:04.498124232 +0100
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
typedef int (*i915_sw_fence_notify_t)(struct i915_sw_fence *,
enum i915_sw_fence_notify state);
-#define __i915_sw_fence_call __aligned(4)
+#define __i915_sw_fence_call /* __aligned(4) */
void __i915_sw_fence_init(struct i915_sw_fence *fence,
i915_sw_fence_notify_t fn,